Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-01-14 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-02-12 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 30.33 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 177 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.005 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.2 µg/L | 40/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 92.735 µg/L 116% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.34 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.9 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.545 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 56.765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70.9 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.1 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 25.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.7 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 11.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.848 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.95 µg/L | 7/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.406 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.42 µg/L | 3/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek
Is Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek serve?
Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek reports serving 380 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 205 violations on file for Mingo County Psd - Lick Creek, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 54 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.