Is Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Mingo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

2,240

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Unaddressed	2026-02-25
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	68.015 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 94.8 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	62.005 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 146 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	40.51 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 57.9 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	8.4715 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	23.205 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30.2 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	27.795 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 31.3 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	17.72 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 29 µg/L	49/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	18.44 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 24.5 µg/L	37/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	22.21 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 26.8 µg/L	30/30	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	3.578 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.72 µg/L	24/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	4760 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 51500 µg/L	20/21	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	47.66 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 77.5 µg/L	17/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	630 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.8400 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L	13/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.5550 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L	10/30	SYR4	2015–2019
Barium	60.46 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 61 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	7/7	LCR	2019
Selenium	1.955 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 2 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2012–2018
Antimony, Total	0.2000 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L	2/7	SYR4	2012–2018
Cadmium	0.4000 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/7	SYR4	2012–2018
Ethylene Dibromide	0.0130 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite	630 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018

53 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: HESS, KEITH

Frequently asked questions about Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck

Is Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck serve?

Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck reports serving 2,159 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2240 violations on file for Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck, of which 51 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 58 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.