← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Point Pleasant Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
21
detected
5,146
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Mason

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
641
violations on file
35
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-01-21
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-02-12
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-12-30
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
659.3 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 671 µg/L
59/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
9.26 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L
53/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Nitrate
4700 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroethylene
1.068 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.09 µg/L
12/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.5775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.78 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
4.615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.65 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
3.335 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.35 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
13.175 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
0.8480 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8500 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.764 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.912 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.08 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.522 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.8580 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8700 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.9935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.32 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2017
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.3900 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
28.1 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Fluoride
1050 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
3370 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2012–2017
54 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TATTERSON, AMBER
Phone
304-675-2360
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Point Pleasant Water Works

Is Point Pleasant Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Point Pleasant Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Point Pleasant Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Trichloroethylene, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Point Pleasant Water Works serve?

Point Pleasant Water Works reports serving 5,146 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Point Pleasant Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 641 violations on file for Point Pleasant Water Works, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 35 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.