Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-21 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-02-12 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 659.3 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 671 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 9.26 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L | 53/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 4700 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroethylene | 1.068 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.09 µg/L | 12/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.5775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.78 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Chloroform | 4.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.65 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.35 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| TTHM | 13.175 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.8480 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8500 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.764 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.912 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.08 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12.522 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 0.8580 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8700 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.9935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.32 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 0.3900 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 28.1 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Fluoride | 1050 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3370 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.25 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Point Pleasant Water Works
Is Point Pleasant Water Works tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Point Pleasant Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Point Pleasant Water Works's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Trichloroethylene, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Point Pleasant Water Works serve?
Point Pleasant Water Works reports serving 5,146 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Point Pleasant Water Works had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 641 violations on file for Point Pleasant Water Works, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 35 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.