Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-01-22 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-01-22 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-01-22 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3186.5 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3190 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 66.4 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.55 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 5.45 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.4 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.9000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 52.7 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.8700 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 9.575 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Fluoride | 542.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 560 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2787.5 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2830 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Nitrite | 326.5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.0222 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Chlordane | 0.0107 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.3200 pCi/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision
Is Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision serve?
Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision reports serving 132 people, per its EPA record.
Has Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 523 violations on file for Wvaw - Deerfield Village Subdivision, of which 54 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 9 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.