← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Hardy County Psd Baker

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
25
detected
150
people served
215
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hardy

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

215
health-based violations
317
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
503 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 881 µg/L
96/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
27.025 µg/L 180%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 148 µg/L
76/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.835 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.41 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
259.7 µg/L 325%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 443 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
262.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 436 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
83.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 368 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
143.5 µg/L 239%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 485.816 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
58.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.2 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1560 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00023 mg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
27.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L
15/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.282 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
13/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
30.375 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1387.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1560 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.0538 pCi/L 41%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.38 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2014
Fluoride
88 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.065 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.27575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.32 µg/L
2/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.7612 pCi/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7860 pCi/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2019
2,4-D
0.3940 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.1 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
44 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
1.6 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
230 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
1.3 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
52 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TPAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MOYERS, LOGAN R.
Phone
304-530-3048
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hardy County Psd Baker

Is Hardy County Psd Baker tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Hardy County Psd Baker's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hardy County Psd Baker's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hardy County Psd Baker serve?

Hardy County Psd Baker reports serving 150 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Hardy County Psd Baker had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 317 violations on file for Hardy County Psd Baker, of which 215 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.