← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

New Cumberland, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
22
detected
1,326
people served
24
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hancock

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

24
health-based violations
256
violations on file
13
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-20

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
143.6 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 168 µg/L
23/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
1910 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.94 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
15/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
3.7805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.37 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.5585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.4095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.81 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
13.685 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.9835 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
3.408 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.88 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.8215 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.86 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.2445 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.27 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.427 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.46 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
65.98 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
149 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.4618 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.56 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.7607 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7800 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroethylene
0.4485 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4500 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.2000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
10.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2140 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Nitrite
230 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
54 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WHITE, WILL
Phone
304-564-3384

Frequently asked questions about New Cumberland, City of

Is New Cumberland, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in New Cumberland, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Cumberland, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Cumberland, City of serve?

New Cumberland, City of reports serving 1,326 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has New Cumberland, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 256 violations on file for New Cumberland, City of, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 13 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.