Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-20 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 143.6 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 168 µg/L | 23/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate | 1910 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.94 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L | 15/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.7805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.37 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.5585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.4095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.81 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.685 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.9835 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.408 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.88 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.8215 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.86 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.2445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.27 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.427 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.46 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 65.98 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 149 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.4618 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.56 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.7607 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7800 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.4485 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4500 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.2000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2140 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 230 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about New Cumberland, City of
Is New Cumberland, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in New Cumberland, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in New Cumberland, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does New Cumberland, City of serve?
New Cumberland, City of reports serving 1,326 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has New Cumberland, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 256 violations on file for New Cumberland, City of, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 13 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.