Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-11-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-11-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-11-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-11-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-29 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 865.95 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 942 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 1.84 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 20/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 5120 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0032 mg/L 21% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 69.675 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 219.5 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.845 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.214 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.52 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.41 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.99 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 25.9 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 15.04 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.92 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.922 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.93 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.415 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.73 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.1046 pCi/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.15 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5345 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.61 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.095 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.1 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 5460 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 340 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chester Water Dept.
Is Chester Water Dept. tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Chester Water Dept.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chester Water Dept.'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chester Water Dept. serve?
Chester Water Dept. reports serving 3,220 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Chester Water Dept. had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 323 violations on file for Chester Water Dept., of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.