Is Global Capital of World Peace Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Hampshire

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2016-07-11
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2016-07-11
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2016-07-11
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2016-07-11
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-10-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-10-01
Other	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2024-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-07-01 → 2022-07-31
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-07-01 → 2022-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	170.1 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 367 µg/L	35/35	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	9.59 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 14 µg/L	35/35	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0078 mg/L 52% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	12/12	LCR	2024
Xylenes, Total	1478.13 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 2110 µg/L	7/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Ethylbenzene	405.28 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L worst single sample: 540 µg/L	6/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	1.01615 pCi/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 1.04 pCi/L	4/4	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	5.164 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.43 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.562 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.73 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	1.962 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.99 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	7.775 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 8.04 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	5.214 µg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 5.56 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	3.975 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Barium	189.685 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 197 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane	0.8955 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	380 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 390 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	1.328 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.34 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	2/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	485.5 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 510 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	2.19 pCi/L 44% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2012
Dichloromethane	0.3900 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	1.49 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrite	510 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2019
Selenium	1 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Styrene	0.6100 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/10	SYR4	2012–2019

53 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: CROSSON, WILLIAM C
Phone: 304-822-7077
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Global Capital of World Peace

Is Global Capital of World Peace tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Global Capital of World Peace's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Global Capital of World Peace's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Xylenes, Total, Ethylbenzene, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Global Capital of World Peace serve?

Global Capital of World Peace reports serving 80 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Global Capital of World Peace had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 40 violations on file for Global Capital of World Peace, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.