Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 63.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.8 µg/L | 121/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 76.1 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.16 µg/L | 121/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 83.8 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 121/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 41 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.3 µg/L | 121/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.8065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 120/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.91 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.4 µg/L | 120/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 95/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 235.6 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 274 µg/L | 60/71 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L | 24/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2026 |
| Lead | 16.845 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L | 20/71 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L | 20/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 350 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 26.985 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1296 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.45915 pCi/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 342.5 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.7000 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Lewisburg
Is Lewisburg tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Lewisburg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Lewisburg's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Lewisburg serve?
Lewisburg reports serving 12,065 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Lewisburg had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 227 violations on file for Lewisburg, of which 47 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 9 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.