← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Lewisburg

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
19
detected
12,065
people served
47
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Greenbrier

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

47
health-based violations
227
violations on file
9
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
63.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.8 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
76.1 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.16 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
83.8 µg/L 140%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.3 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.8065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
120/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
35.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.4 µg/L
120/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
14.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
95/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
235.6 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 274 µg/L
60/71 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
24/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2026
Lead
16.845 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
20/71 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
10.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L
20/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
350 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
26.985 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1296 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.45915 pCi/L 23%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
342.5 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018–2019
Bromoform
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.7000 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WHITE, BEVERLY
Phone
304-645-2080
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lewisburg

Is Lewisburg tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Lewisburg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lewisburg's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lewisburg serve?

Lewisburg reports serving 12,065 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Lewisburg had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 227 violations on file for Lewisburg, of which 47 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 9 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.