Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.7345 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 51.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.2 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 56.385 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.1 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45.455 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.1 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 16.375 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 31.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 69.26 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 154 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.7235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L | 20/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.62 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 19/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.399 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.02 µg/L | 19/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 270 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 75.73 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.1 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 768 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 9.462 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 3/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.58 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.4595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.72 µg/L | 2/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5700 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.7390 pCi/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 110 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Petersburg Town of
Is Petersburg Town of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Petersburg Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Petersburg Town of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Petersburg Town of serve?
Petersburg Town of reports serving 2,841 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Petersburg Town of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 59 violations on file for Petersburg Town of, of which 27 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.