← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Central Barbour Psd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
2,050
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Barbour

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
52
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-06-01 → 2021-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
146.6 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
9.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
47.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.4 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
58.5 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.9 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.1 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.3 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
33.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.9 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
2.805 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
20/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.532 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
17/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.00092 mg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.968 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
13/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
5.3835 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L
4/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.5400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/21 SYR4 2014–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
TALLMAN, KRISTA
Phone
304-457-4026
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Central Barbour Psd

Is Central Barbour Psd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Central Barbour Psd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Central Barbour Psd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Central Barbour Psd serve?

Central Barbour Psd reports serving 2,050 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Central Barbour Psd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 52 violations on file for Central Barbour Psd, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.