Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 92.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 122/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 106.371 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 138.9 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.4225 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57 µg/L | 106/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 816.6 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 903 µg/L | 103/201 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 24.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 98/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 97/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 80.15 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 7.08 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 36/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0056 mg/L 37% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 510 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 11.65 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.3815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4200 µg/L | 8/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Superior Water Light & Power Company
Is Superior Water Light & Power Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Superior Water Light & Power Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Superior Water Light & Power Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Superior Water Light & Power Company serve?
Superior Water Light & Power Company reports serving 26,084 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Superior Water Light & Power Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 25 violations on file for Superior Water Light & Power Company, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.