Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1710 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Copper | 181.81 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 226 µg/L | 7/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 9.918 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 18.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 17.1565 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.445 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 21.2696 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.348 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.5025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.78 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 6.55 pCi/L 131% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.2 pCi/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 3.3 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.32 µg/L | 6/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.3725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.49 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.604 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.77 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.594 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 49.515 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 14.1897 pCi/L 95% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 14.7 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1683.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.4380 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.0100 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.5280 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Camp Douglas Waterworks
Is Camp Douglas Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Camp Douglas Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Camp Douglas Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Copper, Chloroform, Monochloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Camp Douglas Waterworks serve?
Camp Douglas Waterworks reports serving 640 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Camp Douglas Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 36 violations on file for Camp Douglas Waterworks, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.