← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Federal Correctional Institution

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
14
detected
1,550
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Adams

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
85
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-11-02
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-11-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6630 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7300 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
170.15 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 173 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0126 mg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Lead
23.46 µg/L 156%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.8 µg/L
10/20 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
6.1965 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.27 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.292 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.09 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.898 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
14.705 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
4.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
4/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.3885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.3900 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
6865 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7300 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.4385 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
4.7 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
220 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Federal Correctional Institution

Is Federal Correctional Institution tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Federal Correctional Institution's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Federal Correctional Institution's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Federal Correctional Institution serve?

Federal Correctional Institution reports serving 1,550 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Federal Correctional Institution had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 85 violations on file for Federal Correctional Institution, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.