Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 75/75 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 20.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 75/75 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 11.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 23.58 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.56 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 17.0675 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.81 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 790.5 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2800 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 5.205 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.2778 pCi/L 46% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.73 pCi/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Lead | 0.0051 mg/L 34% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 230 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.4620 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4700 µg/L | 5/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.4480 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4500 µg/L | 5/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 9.155 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 783.5 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 240 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.73 pCi/L 18% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fox Crossing Utilities East
Is Fox Crossing Utilities East tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Fox Crossing Utilities East's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fox Crossing Utilities East's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fox Crossing Utilities East serve?
Fox Crossing Utilities East reports serving 10,927 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Fox Crossing Utilities East had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Fox Crossing Utilities East, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.