Tap WaterIndex

← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Neenah Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
17
detected
27,506
people served
13
health-based violations
Wisconsin rankingsLead in WisconsinPFAS in Wisconsin
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Winnebago

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
46
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
66.1 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
300/302 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14.45 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
292/302 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
75.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
130/130 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
81.265 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.67 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.52 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
122/130 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
730 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 803 µg/L
105/202 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0100 mg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 28/28 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
1000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
5.465 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.4590 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4800 µg/L
7/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
7/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.1 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.646 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
5/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
4/130 SYR4 2012–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Neenah Waterworks

Is Neenah Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Neenah Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Neenah Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Neenah Waterworks serve?

Neenah Waterworks reports serving 27,506 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Neenah Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for Neenah Waterworks, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.