Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-04-01 → 2001-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-04-01 → 2001-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-04-01 → 2001-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-04-01 → 2001-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 4195 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4250 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 238.2 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 319 µg/L | 17/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0120 mg/L 80% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 6.329 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.31 µg/L | 10/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.4625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.7925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.52 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 12.605 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.48 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.799 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.005 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.348 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.14 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 178.765 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 202 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4167.5 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4250 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 2.0185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.07 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.909 pCi/L 38% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Fluoride | 308 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.43 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Selenium | 0.9900 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.4031 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4120 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.8770 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8850 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.5000 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Iola Waterworks
Is Iola Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Iola Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Iola Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Iola Waterworks serve?
Iola Waterworks reports serving 1,249 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Iola Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Iola Waterworks, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.