Tap WaterIndex

← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Rueden Ridge Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
16
detected
100
people served
0
health-based violations
Wisconsin rankingsLead in WisconsinPFAS in Wisconsin
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Outagamie

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
29
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
3.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
26.538 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
595.68 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 780 µg/L
7/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.127 pCi/L 63%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.34 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5.344 pCi/L 36%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.36 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.9161 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.023 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
5/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
0.7285 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7300 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.5065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.15 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
9.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
3/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.394 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
2372 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2400 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.7930 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Rueden Ridge Subdivision

Is Rueden Ridge Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Rueden Ridge Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rueden Ridge Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Copper, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rueden Ridge Subdivision serve?

Rueden Ridge Subdivision reports serving 100 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Rueden Ridge Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for Rueden Ridge Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.