Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-04-01 → 2009-01-09 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-04-01 → 2009-01-09 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-04-01 → 2009-01-09 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L | 246/246 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 45.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 246/246 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 244/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 51.37 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L | 244/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.985 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.8 µg/L | 244/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 244/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 778.5 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 104/200 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 137 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 54/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 8.5 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 21/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.3120 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.3200 µg/L | 17/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.8440 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8500 µg/L | 13/246 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 5.775 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 966 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 990 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 6/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 5/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 710 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.4 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Appleton Waterworks
Is Appleton Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Appleton Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Appleton Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Appleton Waterworks serve?
Appleton Waterworks reports serving 74,511 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Appleton Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 50 violations on file for Appleton Waterworks, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.