Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 2800 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3100 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 761.5 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 9.715 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0061 mg/L 41% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.48 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.526 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.63 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 63.25 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 540 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2050 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.643 pCi/L 73% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.03 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 0.9270 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9600 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.6195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6300 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.95183 pCi/L 26% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.03 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 2.16 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.16 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.4800 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sister Bay Waterworks
Is Sister Bay Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Sister Bay Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sister Bay Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sister Bay Waterworks serve?
Sister Bay Waterworks reports serving 1,000 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Sister Bay Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for Sister Bay Waterworks, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.