← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Lawrence Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
5,398
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Brown

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
90
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
701.55 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 731 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
17.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
29.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.8 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
48.44 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 50 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.824 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.36 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
15.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.2415 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
10/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
19.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L
9/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
73.415 µg/L 489%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.5 µg/L
2/20 SYR4 2014–2017
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Lawrence Waterworks

Is Lawrence Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Lawrence Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lawrence Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lawrence Waterworks serve?

Lawrence Waterworks reports serving 5,398 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Lawrence Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 90 violations on file for Lawrence Waterworks, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.