← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Allouez Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
13,923
people served
106
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Brown

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

106
health-based violations
117
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-01-01 → 2007-08-14

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
45.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.305 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
67.9025 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.3 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.726 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.27 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
99/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
80/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
320.5 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
3.83 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
55/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
32/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0059 mg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
Bromoform
0.8150 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8300 µg/L
4/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/100 SYR4 2013–2019

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Allouez Waterworks

Is Allouez Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Allouez Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Allouez Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Allouez Waterworks serve?

Allouez Waterworks reports serving 13,923 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Allouez Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 117 violations on file for Allouez Waterworks, of which 106 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.