Tap WaterIndex

Tap water quality report

Ludwell Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
16
detected
100
people served
38
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Walworth

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

38
health-based violations
224
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Addressed 2020-08-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
465 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0051 mg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2024
Lead
10.75 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
17.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
9/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
17.031 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.07 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
31.2975 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.9 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
84.8 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
394 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.125 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.108 pCi/L 42%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.14 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8680 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Ludwell Estates

Is Ludwell Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Ludwell Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ludwell Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ludwell Estates serve?

Ludwell Estates reports serving 100 people, per its EPA record.

Has Ludwell Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 224 violations on file for Ludwell Estates, of which 38 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.