Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 102 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 77/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 9.26 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 75/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 7.829 pCi/L 157% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 9.03 pCi/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 24 pCi/L 160% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 28.3127 pCi/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.5817 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5820 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0150 mg/L 100% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 140 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 622 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 630 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 6.0135 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.15 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 7/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.313 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.46 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 6/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.5315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5600 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.501 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 80 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.5190 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5300 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.3800 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Burlington Waterworks
Is Burlington Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Burlington Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Burlington Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Burlington Waterworks serve?
Burlington Waterworks reports serving 11,043 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Burlington Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 503 violations on file for Burlington Waterworks, of which 75 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.