Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-07-01 → 2000-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 525.5 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 610 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 3.065 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00030 mg/L 2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 16.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 26.6 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.1 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.9075 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.72 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.7625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7700 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.1 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Barium | 34 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.35 pCi/L 27% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Fluoride | 920 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.3400 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
56 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Concordia University
Is Concordia University tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Concordia University's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Concordia University's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Concordia University serve?
Concordia University reports serving 1,500 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Concordia University had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 27 violations on file for Concordia University, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.