← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Grafton Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
26
detected
12,269
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ozaukee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
216
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-03-01 → 1994-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-03-01 → 1994-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-03-01 → 1994-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Trichloroethylene
31.05 µg/L 621%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
120/265 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1070 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1280 µg/L
107/203 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
4.9 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
86/258 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
3.9 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
76/245 SYR4 2012–2019
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
55.4 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
65/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
65/211 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
9.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
62/211 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2295 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2700 µg/L
62/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
61/211 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
561.5 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
5.05 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
1,1-Dichloroethylene
17 µg/L 243%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
41/229 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
24/211 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.995 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.6755 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
22/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
16/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
14/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0033 mg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Barium
150 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
2080 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.42 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.45 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
3.955 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.6130 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6400 µg/L
4/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
6.45 µg/L 129%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
2/189 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
0.2200 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2014–2017
47 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Grafton Waterworks

Is Grafton Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Grafton Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Grafton Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Trichloroethylene, Fluoride, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Grafton Waterworks serve?

Grafton Waterworks reports serving 12,269 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Grafton Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 216 violations on file for Grafton Waterworks, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.