Tap WaterIndex

← Wisconsin

Tap water quality report

Fox Point Waterworks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
10
detected
6,808
people served
0
health-based violations
Wisconsin rankingsLead in WisconsinPFAS in Wisconsin
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Milwaukee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2005-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2005-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2002-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2002-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
7.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
10.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.405 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
22.8565 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.74 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
16.3815 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.41 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.9830 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
18/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
6/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0074 mg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2025
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Frequently asked questions about Fox Point Waterworks

Is Fox Point Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Fox Point Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fox Point Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fox Point Waterworks serve?

Fox Point Waterworks reports serving 6,808 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.

Has Fox Point Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Fox Point Waterworks, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.