Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-12-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-12-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-12-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-12-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-08-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-08-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-08-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-08-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-08-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1020 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1490 µg/L | 102/200 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 135.5 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 13.3 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0370 mg/L 247% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 4400 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.7765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7900 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.455 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 4.979 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.24 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.4235 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.59 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 8/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 7/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 35.85 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.695 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 4/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5590 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5600 µg/L | 2/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cadmium | 0.2780 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2800 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.3436 pCi/L 47% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.388 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 3.975 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 2/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3695 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3700 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.3000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.3500 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.3300 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mineral Point Waterworks
Is Mineral Point Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Mineral Point Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mineral Point Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mineral Point Waterworks serve?
Mineral Point Waterworks reports serving 2,487 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Mineral Point Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 93 violations on file for Mineral Point Waterworks, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.