Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-01-01 → 1993-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-01-01 → 1993-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-01-01 → 1993-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 831.75 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 96/192 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.77 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 54/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12.279 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.692 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 10.8185 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.61 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 49/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.695 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L | 42/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 92.97 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 169.4 µg/L | 34/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 19.14 µg/L 128% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.1 µg/L | 34/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.835 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 32/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0113 mg/L 75% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 24/24 | LCR | 2023 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.19 µg/L | 21/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.456 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L | 19/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.18705 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.46 µg/L | 8/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 18.39 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.8855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L | 2/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.7900 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.0700 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 3.5 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.15333 pCi/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Beaver Dam Water Utility
Is Beaver Dam Water Utility tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Beaver Dam Water Utility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Beaver Dam Water Utility's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Beaver Dam Water Utility serve?
Beaver Dam Water Utility reports serving 16,200 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Beaver Dam Water Utility had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Beaver Dam Water Utility, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.