Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-09-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-09-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0234 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 9.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 52/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 29.725 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.2 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 44/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 13.3 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 43/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 39/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 34/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0021 mg/L 14% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.0445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 4/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 4/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.5600 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Woodland City of
Is Woodland City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Woodland City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Woodland City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Woodland City of serve?
Woodland City of reports serving 10,640 people in Washington, per its EPA record.
Has Woodland City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 516 violations on file for Woodland City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.