← Washington

Tap water quality report

Washington Corrections Center

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 57 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

57
contaminants tested
6
detected
2,223
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Mason

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
73
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Chloroform
1.304 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L
13/18 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
1.285 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
1300 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
456 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Toluene
0.7300 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2013–2019
51 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Matthew Murphy-Dickson

Frequently asked questions about Washington Corrections Center

Is Washington Corrections Center tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Washington Corrections Center's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Washington Corrections Center's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Nitrate, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Washington Corrections Center serve?

Washington Corrections Center reports serving 2,223 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Washington Corrections Center had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for Washington Corrections Center, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.