Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
13
detected
111,415
people served
2
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Skagit

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1987-11-19 → 1987-12-18
MCL Health-based Archived 1984-10-01 → 1985-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0211 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.8 µg/L
241/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
50.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 90.9 µg/L
237/240 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
52.93 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.5 µg/L
235/235 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
31.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.6 µg/L
233/234 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L
213/214 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
158/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
79/232 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2024
Nitrate
250 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 12/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.565 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
4/245 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
167.5 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/245 SYR4 2012–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitriteNitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Jamie LeBlanc

Frequently asked questions about Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res

Is Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res serve?

Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res reports serving 111,415 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Skagit County Pud 1 Judy Res, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.