← Washington

Tap water quality report

Schluter Water Association

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
7
detected
224
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Snohomish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-07-01 → 1992-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
2.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
46.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
48.76 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.3 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.15 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
Chris Gott

Frequently asked questions about Schluter Water Association

Is Schluter Water Association tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Schluter Water Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Schluter Water Association's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Schluter Water Association serve?

Schluter Water Association reports serving 224 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Schluter Water Association had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Schluter Water Association, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.