Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Royal Coachman Mobil Est

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 20 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

20
contaminants tested
10
detected
37
people served
4
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Whatcom

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
113
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-03-01 → 1992-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2670 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 18/18 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
0.00050 mg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
1.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2018
Chloroform
0.7900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/3 SYR4 2013–2018
TTHM
3.15 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.1 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2018
10 contaminants tested, none detected
2,4,5-TP2,4-DBromoformDalaponDinosebMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitritePentachlorophenolPicloram

Utility contact

Contact
Robert Hoagland

Frequently asked questions about Royal Coachman Mobil Est

Is Royal Coachman Mobil Est tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Royal Coachman Mobil Est's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Royal Coachman Mobil Est's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Royal Coachman Mobil Est serve?

Royal Coachman Mobil Est reports serving 37 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Royal Coachman Mobil Est had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 113 violations on file for Royal Coachman Mobil Est, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.