Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Kirkland City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 41 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

41
contaminants tested
10
detected
69,243
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
King

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
1
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
22.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
47.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70.2 µg/L
123/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
38.38 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L
123/123 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
50.698 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.42 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.9075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.21 µg/L
114/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
18/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.33 µg/L
6/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L
2/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/124 SYR4 2012–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
Tom Chriest

Frequently asked questions about Kirkland City of

Is Kirkland City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Kirkland City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kirkland City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kirkland City of serve?

Kirkland City of reports serving 69,243 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Kirkland City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1 violation on file for Kirkland City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.