Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Mccormick Woods

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 85 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

85
contaminants tested
7
detected
2,760
people served
25
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kitsap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

25
health-based violations
59
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-09-01 → 1997-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2025
Nitrate
420 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 12/16 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
2.519 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.71 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
0.7900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.5100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Scott Wolf

Frequently asked questions about Mccormick Woods

Is Mccormick Woods tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Mccormick Woods's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mccormick Woods's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mccormick Woods serve?

Mccormick Woods reports serving 2,760 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Mccormick Woods had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for Mccormick Woods, of which 25 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.