Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1997-01-01 → 1998-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chloroform | 15.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 17.045 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 8.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 19.17 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 10.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Arsenic | 6.95 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Fluoride | 200 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chinook Estates
Is Chinook Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Chinook Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chinook Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chinook Estates serve?
Chinook Estates reports serving 455 people in Washington, per its EPA record.
Has Chinook Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Chinook Estates, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.