Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3500 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4400 µg/L | 70/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 5.4835 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.599 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 30/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.01 µg/L | 23/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L | 21/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0064 mg/L 43% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromoform | 0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3440 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3500 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.9 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.762 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.04 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fruitland Mutual Water Company
Is Fruitland Mutual Water Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Fruitland Mutual Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fruitland Mutual Water Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fruitland Mutual Water Company serve?
Fruitland Mutual Water Company reports serving 15,313 people in Washington, per its EPA record.
Has Fruitland Mutual Water Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 135 violations on file for Fruitland Mutual Water Company, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.