← Washington

Tap water quality report

Fragaria Landing

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 64 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

64
contaminants tested
4
detected
235
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Kitsap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-07-01 → 1999-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-07-01 → 1999-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-07-01 → 1999-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1996-02-01 → 1996-02-29
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Arsenic
2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
2 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Chromium
4 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Kevin Odegard

Frequently asked questions about Fragaria Landing

Is Fragaria Landing tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Fragaria Landing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fragaria Landing's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Chromium. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fragaria Landing serve?

Fragaria Landing reports serving 235 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Fragaria Landing had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Fragaria Landing, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.