← Washington

Tap water quality report

Southcreek #1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
8
detected
69
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Pierce

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
36
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
400 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
TTHM
2.32 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.8700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
0.6700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.8850 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Arsenic
2.38 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
420 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
James Jensen

Frequently asked questions about Southcreek #1

Is Southcreek #1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Southcreek #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southcreek #1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southcreek #1 serve?

Southcreek #1 reports serving 69 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Southcreek #1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 36 violations on file for Southcreek #1, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.