← Washington

Tap water quality report

Everett Public Works Dept. City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
15
detected
215,774
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Snohomish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
5
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2007-03-01 → 2007-03-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
54.035 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
234/234 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
218/220 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
43.1 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.6 µg/L
218/218 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
188/188 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.485 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
144/145 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
141/141 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
49/229 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
Nitrate
111 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
4.37 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
0.8400 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
794 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.0520 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
73 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Nitrite
2 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2018
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Jeffrey Marrs

Frequently asked questions about Everett Public Works Dept. City of

Is Everett Public Works Dept. City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Everett Public Works Dept. City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Everett Public Works Dept. City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Everett Public Works Dept. City of serve?

Everett Public Works Dept. City of reports serving 215,774 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Everett Public Works Dept. City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 5 violations on file for Everett Public Works Dept. City of, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.