Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1995 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L | 62/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 31/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 9.775 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 29/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.572 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 28/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2000 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.09 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 3/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.09 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 3/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Enumclaw Water Department
Is Enumclaw Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Enumclaw Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Enumclaw Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Enumclaw Water Department serve?
Enumclaw Water Department reports serving 23,276 people in Washington, per its EPA record.
Has Enumclaw Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 37 violations on file for Enumclaw Water Department, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.