Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Edmonds City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 41 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

41
contaminants tested
8
detected
34,065
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Snohomish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.79 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.1 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
54.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.5 µg/L
119/119 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
57.36 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.4 µg/L
119/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.945 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L
118/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
28.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.6 µg/L
117/117 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
13/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
47.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/125 SYR4 2012–2019
33 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
Jeffrey Kobylk

Frequently asked questions about Edmonds City of

Is Edmonds City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Edmonds City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Edmonds City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Edmonds City of serve?

Edmonds City of reports serving 34,065 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Edmonds City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Edmonds City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.