← Washington

Tap water quality report

Cuyamaca Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 57 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

57
contaminants tested
8
detected
106
people served
11
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Thurston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
21
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2000 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0175 mg/L 117%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
1892 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1900 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
3 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
0.5800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
0.5800 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
49 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
James Jensen

Frequently asked questions about Cuyamaca Village

Is Cuyamaca Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Cuyamaca Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cuyamaca Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cuyamaca Village serve?

Cuyamaca Village reports serving 106 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Cuyamaca Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Cuyamaca Village, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.