Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Friar Creek Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
7
detected
135
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Snohomish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
2.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
58.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
60.75 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.7 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
31.825 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.9 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2013–2019
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
Raymond Phelps

Frequently asked questions about Friar Creek Water

Is Friar Creek Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Friar Creek Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Friar Creek Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Friar Creek Water serve?

Friar Creek Water reports serving 135 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Friar Creek Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Friar Creek Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.