Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Crockett Lake Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 48 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

48
contaminants tested
5
detected
325
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Island

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
47
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1390 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 10/12 SYR4 2013–2018
Arsenic
1.1 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Fluoride
590 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Nitrate-Nitrite
710 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
43 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylbenzeneLeadMercuryNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Andrew Campbell

Frequently asked questions about Crockett Lake Water District

Is Crockett Lake Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Crockett Lake Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Crockett Lake Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, Arsenic, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Crockett Lake Water District serve?

Crockett Lake Water District reports serving 325 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Crockett Lake Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 47 violations on file for Crockett Lake Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.