← Washington

Tap water quality report

Clinton Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
15
detected
1,980
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Island

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-04-01 → 1996-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-07-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-07-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-07-01 → 1992-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1828 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1880 µg/L
34/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0098 mg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
TTHM
7.7 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.555 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
8.7 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016
Arsenic
1.095 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016
Fluoride
176 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016
Nitrate-Nitrite
1683.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1690 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016
Cyanide
54 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2016
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2016
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Adam Lehman

Frequently asked questions about Clinton Water District

Is Clinton Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Clinton Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Clinton Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Clinton Water District serve?

Clinton Water District reports serving 1,980 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Clinton Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Clinton Water District, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.