Tap WaterIndex

← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Rutland Town Fire District 4

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
6
detected
136
people served
3
health-based violations
Vermont rankingsLead in VermontPFAS in Vermont
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rutland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
155
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
5.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.3 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
65.1 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
73.72 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.4 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
53.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.7 µg/L
11/13 SYR4 2012–2019
5 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
KAMYK, KEVIN
Phone
802-775-3196
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rutland Town Fire District 4

Is Rutland Town Fire District 4 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Rutland Town Fire District 4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rutland Town Fire District 4's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rutland Town Fire District 4 serve?

Rutland Town Fire District 4 reports serving 136 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Rutland Town Fire District 4 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 155 violations on file for Rutland Town Fire District 4, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.