← Vermont

Tap water quality report

East Mountain Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
8
detected
76
people served
17
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Bennington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
451
violations on file
10
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
2.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
60.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
62.915 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.1 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.96 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
22.815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
22.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.5000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
DENIO, DAWN
Phone
802-379-1837
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about East Mountain Mhp

Is East Mountain Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in East Mountain Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Mountain Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Mountain Mhp serve?

East Mountain Mhp reports serving 76 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has East Mountain Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 451 violations on file for East Mountain Mhp, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.