Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 700 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 770 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0023 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 1.525 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 30.735 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 39.31 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 15.69 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.99 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
4 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sterling Spring
Is Sterling Spring tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Sterling Spring's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sterling Spring's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sterling Spring serve?
Sterling Spring reports serving 200 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.
Has Sterling Spring had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 21 violations on file for Sterling Spring, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.